Questionable conservative personality Tucker Carlson went back to Russia to speak with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov following a prominent interview with President Vladimir Putin in February.
Their coversation covered topics such as United States -Russian relations, Washingtons diplomacy and Russias current usage of the Oreshnik missile.Throughout the interview, Lavrov repeated basic Russian talking points about the war in Ukraine and cast doubt over the accuracy of the Bucha massacre, in addition to the poisonings of Alexei Navalny and Sergei and Yulia Skripal utilizing the Novichok nerve agent.The Moscow Times scrutinized several claims made in the interview.American servicemen are launching Western long-range missiles into Russia Lavrov and CarlsonWhen Carlson revealed this interview, he stated clearly that American military personnel introduced rockets into mainland Russia, while Lavrov claimed that Ukraine would not have the ability to do so without United States servicemen.There is no evidence that American servicemen are launching ATACMS or any other Western missile systems either into Russia or at targets in Ukraine.
Kyiv utilizes HIMARS platforms to launch its United States -donated ATACMS missiles.
Ukrainian servicemen were trained by United States personnel on how to use them in the United States, Germany and Poland.Russia did not start the war in Ukraine LavrovLike Putin, Lavrov attempted to blame NATO and the West for the war in Ukraine, firmly insisting that Russia did not start it despite introducing a full-scale intrusion of the nation in February 2022 and trying to catch the capital, Kyiv.Russia is not discussing eradicating anybodies population with nuclear weapons LavrovSince the start of the war, Russian officials have actually referenced their nations nuclear arsenal over 200 times.
A number of these declarations including some by Lavrov referenced nuclear escalation spiraling out of control with fatal consequences in a pattern experts state are aimed at preventing Western assistance to Ukraine.Furthermore, propagandists on state television have actually boasted that Russia might use nuclear weapons to ruin NATO member states, including erasing Britain with a radioactive tsunami.Casting doubt over the Bucha massacre LavrovLavrov, like numerous other Russian authorities, has actually claimed that proof that Russian forces massacred civilians in the Ukrainian city of Bucha was staged and blatantly provocative.This is in spite of proof varying from witness statement and caught video to obstructed phone and radio interactions of Russian systems and satellite images showing bodies scattered in the streets during the occupation.While Lavrov did not explicitly state that no massacre occurred in this interview, he told Carlson that he consistently asked the UN to supply Russia with an official list of individuals killed in order to substantiate the accusations leveled versus Russias forces.
However, the identities of the massacres victims are not a trick: morgues in the city publishedlists of determined and unidentified bodies, and the Bucha City Council informed The Insider that a verified list was offered on request.Did the Russians truly toxin Navalny? LavrovSimilarly, Lavrov recommended that the West was concealing the results of tests in a German healthcare facility that figured out the now-dead Kremlin critic was poisoned with Novichok, a nerve representative developed in Russia.
Nevertheless, a medical report from Navalnys doctors at the Berlin Charit Hospital was launched in the prominent Lancet medical journal in January 2021.
Navalny called the reports publication evidence of the poisoning Russia keeps demanding.Plans for British marine bases on the Azov Sea LavrovIn 2021, London and Kyiv signed an agreement to boost Ukraines naval abilities.
This consisted of arrangements to produce new warships along with the building of two brand-new naval bases on the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov.However, these plans were for Ukrainian bases built with British support, not British Royal Navy bases on Ukrainian territory.Zelensky is no longer the democratically chosen president of Ukraine CarlsonOrdinarily, Zelenskys term as president would have ended in May 2024, following elections that March.
Elections in Ukraine are clearly prohibited under martial law, which was stated on Feb.
24, 2022.
Regardless of this, some critics have declared it is unconstitutional for Zelensky to remain president.
Constitutional attorneys informed The Kyiv Independent which has actually been crucial of Zelenskys federal government that he is legally permitted to do so and that elections might not be held in wartime.
The European Commission found that while martial law infringed on some basic rights of Ukrainian residents, these short-term constraints were proportional to the crisis.Zelensky banned peace negotiations with Russia LavrovThis claim, which Putin also made in his conversation with Carlson, is inaccurate.
Zelesnkys expense prohibited settlements with Putin but left the door open for discussions with another Russian president.